Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:19:11 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Retiring WITHOUT_CXX Message-ID: <CANCZdfqd790WFoGxhEEUNjo4dQU6ntn9ZaE55wa-cHmcOz1Lnw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20211126180239.rwuaaq3onohjoywv@aniel.nours.eu> References: <CAPyFy2Bs76J=UVotL6McqdHVNwhtYmfQq7U2xpXVKiQTpa78Lw@mail.gmail.com> <202111261709.1AQH9sHg025507@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <20211126180239.rwuaaq3onohjoywv@aniel.nours.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:04 AM Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > For any embedded systems the WITHOUT_* have never been enough and there > are way > to build a very very tiny viable FreeBSD image in an industrial manner > which are > way more efficient that the WITHOUT KNOBS. I am not saying we should stop > providing those, just we should stop maintaining the one that makes no > sense > anymore or are very complicated to maintain. > Has anybody ever done the radical experiment of instrumenting a 'fat' system with filemon to see everything that's used/touched during operations and tailoring lists of files to include based on that (plus maybe some white listing for things like supported locales)? Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfqd790WFoGxhEEUNjo4dQU6ntn9ZaE55wa-cHmcOz1Lnw>