Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2021 11:19:11 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd-rwg@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Retiring WITHOUT_CXX Message-ID: <CANCZdfqd790WFoGxhEEUNjo4dQU6ntn9ZaE55wa-cHmcOz1Lnw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20211126180239.rwuaaq3onohjoywv@aniel.nours.eu> References: <CAPyFy2Bs76J=UVotL6McqdHVNwhtYmfQq7U2xpXVKiQTpa78Lw@mail.gmail.com> <202111261709.1AQH9sHg025507@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> <20211126180239.rwuaaq3onohjoywv@aniel.nours.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--00000000000057aa6705d1b52154 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 11:04 AM Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> wrote: > For any embedded systems the WITHOUT_* have never been enough and there > are way > to build a very very tiny viable FreeBSD image in an industrial manner > which are > way more efficient that the WITHOUT KNOBS. I am not saying we should stop > providing those, just we should stop maintaining the one that makes no > sense > anymore or are very complicated to maintain. > Has anybody ever done the radical experiment of instrumenting a 'fat' system with filemon to see everything that's used/touched during operations and tailoring lists of files to include based on that (plus maybe some white listing for things like supported locales)? Warner --00000000000057aa6705d1b52154--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfqd790WFoGxhEEUNjo4dQU6ntn9ZaE55wa-cHmcOz1Lnw>