From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 12 13:13:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F1B16A41F; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:13:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob@hudson-trading.com) Received: from daemon.mistermishap.net (167-49.nyc.dsl.access.net [166.84.167.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331E643D45; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:13:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rob@hudson-trading.com) Received: from daemon.mistermishap.net (localhost.mistermishap.net [127.0.0.1]) by daemon.mistermishap.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j9CDDDmU054741; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:13:13 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rob@hudson-trading.com) Received: from localhost (rob@localhost) by daemon.mistermishap.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id j9CDDDCv054738; Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:13:13 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: daemon.mistermishap.net: rob owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:13:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Rob Watt X-X-Sender: rob@daemon.mistermishap.net To: Don Lewis In-Reply-To: <200510112228.j9BMSACh046318@gw.catspoiler.org> Message-ID: <20051012091120.M54709@daemon.mistermishap.net> References: <200510112228.j9BMSACh046318@gw.catspoiler.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: rob work , mikep@hudson-trading.com, Jason Carroll , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-5.4-stable panics X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:13:16 -0000 > >> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Don Lewis wrote: > I MFC'ed the fix to RELENG_6 last week, but the patch didn't apply > cleanly to RELENG_5. I tweaked the patch for RELENG_5 and tested it on > a UP box. I'd like to get some testing on SMP hardware before I commit > it to RELENG_5, just to make sure that I don't destabilize -STABLE. I > do want to get the fix into RELENG_5, since this thread originated with > a complaint about 5.4-STABLE. I should be able to have a 5.4 machine available to test this tonight. Can you send me the tweaked patch? - Rob Watt