From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 16 22:11:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A091065693 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@dougbarton.us) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349918FC0A for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:11:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24130 invoked by uid 399); 16 Feb 2011 21:44:37 -0000 Received: from router.ka9q.net (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@75.60.237.91) by mail2.fluidhosting.com with ESMTPAM; 16 Feb 2011 21:44:37 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 75.60.237.91 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4D5C4544.9030803@dougbarton.us> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:44:36 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20110129 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Cran References: <201102131818.p1DIIuLL046962@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201102131818.p1DIIuLL046962@svn.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r218650 - head/games/fortune/datfiles X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:11:23 -0000 On 02/13/2011 10:18, Bruce Cran wrote: > Author: brucec > Date: Sun Feb 13 18:18:56 2011 > New Revision: 218650 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/218650 > > Log: > Move potentially offensive fortune to fortunes-o. FYI, we never ever do this unless there is a really good reason. The problem is that what is offensive in one person's eyes is not in another's, and this is an area that can (speaking from experience) become a huge bikeshed. To be clear, I don't specifically object to this change, nor the MFC, I'm not asking for you to revert it, etc. etc. I am merely stating a rather strong preference that before another change of this nature is considered that very careful thought is given to whether it's worth it. hth, Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/