From owner-cvs-all Fri Aug 6 17:31:26 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF51E156E6; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 17:31:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7A2AE1C09; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 19:33:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ABB3813; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 19:33:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 19:33:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Tim Vanderhoek Cc: committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux_base In-Reply-To: <19990806192008.F11290@mad> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 02:09:48PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > For those who thought I was on crack when I said linux_base > > was broken I'd encourage you to go visit: > > > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/4-latest/linux_base-5.2.log > > Now we know you're on crack. ;-) > > Read farther down the disclaimer on /errorlogs/. > > The linux_base has never worked for the -current package build sweep. > This isn't a problem and has been deemed acceptable. Until Satoshi > decides to split his (eight?) machines between running -current and > running -stable, such problems will probably always exist. I can reproduce the exact same error just trying a port build. We now don't support -CURRENT? -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message