From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 17 20:37:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E9D37B401; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx7.mail.ru (mx7.mail.ru [194.67.23.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B4843F93; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 20:37:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kabaev@mail.ru) Received: from [141.154.73.157] (port=49897 helo=kan.dnsalias.net) by mx7.mail.ru with esmtp id 19dM3c-00014N-00; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 07:37:20 +0400 Received: from kan.dnsalias.net (ak03@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kan.dnsalias.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h6I3bIOj062408; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 23:37:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kan@kan.dnsalias.net) Received: (from kan@localhost) by kan.dnsalias.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h6I3bHIP062367; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 23:37:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 23:37:17 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <20030717233717.35012515.kabaev@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030717210220.GA34941@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030713010957.2181af46.yosimoto@waishi.jp> <20030717092556.70a96dc9.yosimoto@waishi.jp> <200307171511.h6HFBdPa000471@mail.mk.bsdclub.org> <20030717205946.GA34884@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030717210220.GA34941@rot13.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.0claws50 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Motoyuki Konno cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some ports are broken after upgrading GCC 3.3.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 03:37:23 -0000 On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:02:20 -0700 Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Sorry, I missed the patch in your email. I'm not certain about your > approach...can someone who understands the issues comment on it? > > Kris > I'd rather see all varargs.h consumers be converted to stdarg.h. Old varargs GCC builtins were _removed_ altogether from the compiler sources and we should follow.