From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 13:08:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A441065679; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:08:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from emaste@freebsd.org) Received: from mail1.sandvine.com (Mail1.sandvine.com [64.7.137.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A7B8FC0C; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from labgw2.phaedrus.sandvine.com (192.168.222.22) by WTL-EXCH-1.sandvine.com (192.168.196.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.0.694.0; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:08:02 -0400 Received: by labgw2.phaedrus.sandvine.com (Postfix, from userid 10332) id 9C93733C00; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:08:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:08:12 -0400 From: Ed Maste To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20100930130812.GA79354@sandvine.com> References: <201009291308.o8TD8NHo009975@svn.freebsd.org> <4CA42F56.4070604@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CA42F56.4070604@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r213270 - head/etc/rc.d X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:08:13 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:33:58PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 9/29/2010 6:08 AM, Ed Maste wrote: > | Author: emaste > | Date: Wed Sep 29 13:08:23 2010 > | New Revision: 213270 > | URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/213270 ... > Could you please back this (and your related changes) out, and evaluate > Jeremy's script? I, and other users have evaluated it for some time now > and found it effective; and I'd like to see it committed, especially now > that Jeremy has updated it. Backing this out doesn't improve anything, so I'm not going to do that. This change is an improvement to what's in the tree today, and the original author of this script agreed with the approach. I will review Jeremy's script as time permits; if it is a viable replacement for defaultroute then we can just replace defaultroute with it, and my change can then end up in /dev/null. -Ed