From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Aug 27 12:24:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA07534 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 12:24:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from phluffy.lm.com (phluffy.lm.com [204.171.44.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA07339; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 12:23:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from myke@ees.com) Received: from localhost (myke@localhost) by phluffy.lm.com (8.9.0/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA04260; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 15:23:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from myke@ees.com) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 15:23:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike Holling X-Sender: myke@phluffy.lm.com To: "Ron 'The Insane One' Rosson" cc: Sheldon Hearn , dima@best.net, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SSH port In-Reply-To: <19980827113954.A11893@oneinsane.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > After this post I am going to bear down and read the license. The thing that > gets me is that the previous versions before it have always been 'freely > distributable'. This is starting to smell like the same thing > that happened with Xfree. I could be wrong. If anyone has nessus installed > on their system and ssh also you will pick up on the possibility of an > insecure ssh. Again I could e wrong and jumping in the wrong direction > but it kinda rattled my cage. I believe the 2.x branch is a complete rewrite of the code, done by DataFellows. It's essentially a different codebase done by different people. - Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message