From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar 30 17:29:32 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C65EB16A4CE; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:29:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 51D7043D3F; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:29:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by fledge.watson.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2V1R5xC003047;
	Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:27:05 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i2V1R4hK003044;
	Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:27:04 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org)
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 20:27:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org
To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
In-Reply-To: <xzpwu51om9j.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040330202616.1917E-100000@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
cc: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: performance of jailed processes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 01:29:32 -0000


On Wed, 31 Mar 2004, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:

> Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> > I'd be very interested in knowing if changing your application to bind
> > alternative IP addresses rather than using jail to force the binding to=
 an
> > alternative address changes the performance results.  I.e., are we look=
ing
> > at a problem with additional aliases and not a problem with jail at all=
=2E..
>=20
> I reproduced the problem with scp, then threw in -oBindAddress=3Dfoo.  It
> seems you're on to something; running it outside any jail but bound to
> one of the aliases gave the same symptoms as running it from inside a
> jail.=20

Are your aliases configured on lo0, or on the ethernet interface?  Could
we see some excerpted ifconfig output for your interface (perhaps only ten
-- first five, last five of the 2000+ IP addresses :-).=20

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects
robert@fledge.watson.org      Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research