From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Mar 15 9:55: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.92.13.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F0F37B417 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:54:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g2FHrhlv044243; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:53:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g2FHqSML044241; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:52:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 09:52:28 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Jan Stocker Cc: Terry Lambert , Alexander Kabaev , Martin Blapp , imp@village.org, edhall@weirdnoise.com, kris@obsecurity.org, current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, edhall@screech.weirdnoise.com Subject: Re: gcc -O broken in CURRENT Message-ID: <20020315095228.B44160@dragon.nuxi.com> Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3C911606.D9F74169@mindspring.com> <000001c1cc1e$318e9e80$fe02010a@twoflower.liebende.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000001c1cc1e$318e9e80$fe02010a@twoflower.liebende.de>; from jstocker@tzi.de on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:37:39PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 01:37:39PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote: > A little bit... most of you argumenting about binary incompatibility > for -stable. OK... no chance to do it there, its my opinion too. But why not > doing it for current and using that most common dwarf unwinding now (for a There is no need to cause developers to go thru several ABI changes such that they cannot get their other FreeBSD development done. With GCC 3.1 a number of ABI changes will happen. > > Port has less patches. If you look at > > /usr/src/contrib/gcc/contrib/freebsd.h and > > /usr/src/contrib/gcc/contrib/i386/freebsd.h you will see how much things > > have to be modified because we support dual ELF/a.out [still]. > > This may be changed too for 5.0 shouldnt it? Why? I don't see how you justfied removing the functionality and I don't see how it is causing you any problems being there. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message