From owner-freebsd-current Sat Oct 26 08:14:35 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA01145 for current-outgoing; Sat, 26 Oct 1996 08:14:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from answerman.mindspring.com (answerman.mindspring.com [204.180.128.8]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA01138 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 1996 08:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rlb.users.mindspring.com (user-168-121-25-139.dialup.mindspring.com [168.121.25.139]) by answerman.mindspring.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA01359 for ; Sat, 26 Oct 1996 11:17:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <32722AEA.59E2B600@mindspring.com> Date: Sat, 26 Oct 1996 11:14:50 -0400 From: Ron Bolin X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Question on Current Philosophy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Is it normal to have so many problems in building from current. Since 10-14 I have never been able to make a complete make world because of undefined or non-existent defines or variables/functions residing in the code. Is this normal and expected, are the developers expecting current users to report this? I am in a position to test the code, but I don't have time to run down the unresolved defines and functions. That shoudl be the developer who is responsible for the module? If I have got this wrong, please correct me, as this seems very frustrating from my point of view. Is a SNAP suppose to be the only reliable build? THank's Ron -- **************************************************************************** Ron Bolin rlb@mindspring.com, http://www.mindspring.com/~rlb/ GSU: gs01rlb@panther.gsu.edu matrlbx@indigo4.cs.gsu.edu Home: 770-992-8877 ****************************************************************************