From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Mar 23 14:50:39 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411AF16A420
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:50:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C3543D68
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:50:20 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k2NEoJKH051516;
	Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:50:19 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from scottl@samsco.org)
Message-ID: <4422B5A5.8040006@samsco.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:50:13 -0700
From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051230
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
References: <20060322122906.A41691@xorpc.icir.org>
	<20060323001555.GA1811@tin.it> <20060323142518.GA1308@tin.it>
	<20060323063139.A67037@xorpc.icir.org>
	<4422B3C8.3080303@samsco.org>
	<20060323064805.B67264@xorpc.icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060323064805.B67264@xorpc.icir.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed 
	version=3.1.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org
Cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: interesting(?) data on network interrupt servicing
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:50:39 -0000

Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 07:42:16AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> 
>>Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, Mar 23, 2006 at 03:25:18PM +0100, Paolo Pisati wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
>>>>ok, i updated my CURRENT and rerun the tests (and while here 
>>>>i disabled SMP):
>>>>
>>>>phk's optimization to cpu ticks calculation shaved 4k ticks,
>>>
>>>this makes it a very good candidate for MFC when 6.1 is out ?
> 
> ...
> 
>>I haven't been paying close enough attention, have all of the calcru
>>problems and other side effects been fixed from phk's work?
> 
> 
> we should ask phk. As far as i remember the only "problem"
> is/was that the sys/user times are computed as if the
> cpu were running at its max speed. But this is in fact
> a good thing because it is a more consistent measurement of
> the cost of the CPU work, which decouples us from having
> to take care of variable cpu speed.
> 
> luigi

No, I'm talking about all of the resulting problems with processes
generating calcru messages on the console.

Scott