From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 4 22:15:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F0EAF62; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 22:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06DC12E5; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 22:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:cc06:8a07:85a3:8279]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8521F4AC5A; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 02:15:40 +0400 (MSK) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 02:15:36 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1801933421.20140205021536@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Lev Serebryakov Subject: Re: opteron a1100 arm In-Reply-To: <28896996.20140205021201@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1391538649.19169.79261269.3C5F49D1@webmail.messagingengine.com> <493DEB39-C4B4-409E-B8B2-B1B11E013754@netgate.com> <60555.1391549390@critter.freebsd.dk> <23B18B88-D888-46B3-99F6-905F86E20FAF@netgate.com> <28896996.20140205021201@serebryakov.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Thomas Zander , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Jim Thompson , Poul-Henning Kamp X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 22:15:42 -0000 Hello, Lev. You wrote 5 =F4=E5=E2=F0=E0=EB=FF 2014 =E3., 2:12:01: JT>> But by all means, port FreeBSD to it. Perhaps it can be the JT>> long-desired =93reference platform=94 to bring ARM into a =93Tier 1=94= architecture status. LS> It is ARMv8A, which is differs from ARMv5/6/7 as i385 from amd64. So, = we LS> should talks about TWO architectures here, as we talk about i386 and am= d64. I'm not even sure, that we have compiler for ARMv8, as we have very old gcc, and is LLVM AArch64 backend production-ready? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov