From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 1 12:00:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4545F106566C for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xorquewasp@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FF78FC0C for ; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so1066615bwz.13 for ; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:00:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc :subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Lc1JDoib8/s6Foiw3mWb1T2dLXthP8BfJ5vd7gP/Xjs=; b=BQpDUHBp5sjXaADS6o1NZ6qipijZWr5/HwihrohIbQ3NzRC1cQqCWrodumAY/Uoe3e PF+NfOc+pICfUyWXHkR2xl86Bojj2xZ6ruTqAycNvF65kd1+cBro2imVOy3MK0iQdOBB 6YMJwQ2Qn0zDv4nb1uxm7i1eHrejpBJf+HYgI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to; b=K9VAGb/sCqOZ0p95TSusx6KEh4HkmOoJSMuInHJPK1TG+f7gSkNNARYAFvfaabskHZ NQTxnZjERP3sXE4RAG0MJ+YMQ2IIXjTdSoT9vyeOwraHwiSuX74GQBP6nCHWk4gTIpwT R8GHf1IcSp27hp9ibzwLm1kpggDWX1wO8LswE= Received: by 10.204.160.134 with SMTP id n6mr7434738bkx.0.1277985608266; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viper.internal.network (dsl78-143-207-253.in-addr.fast.co.uk [78.143.207.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bh14sm12158500bkb.2.2010.07.01.05.00.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by viper.internal.network (Postfix, from userid 11001) id 6BF154AC29; Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 12:00:06 +0000 From: xorquewasp@googlemail.com To: Mikle Krutov Message-ID: <20100701120006.GA28132@logik.internal.network> References: <20100624121141.GA40498@logik.internal.network> <20100624232839.GA53471@logik.internal.network> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 wine on amd64 - DRI a lost cause? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 12:00:17 -0000 On 2010-07-01 15:28:00, Mikle Krutov wrote: > Sorry for late-answer, but why are you running wine in jail? > May be that's the source of the problem. > For me, it was just installed into /usr/local/ as some other > program, some 32bit libs were in lib32, and so on. As mentioned, I've tried it in a jail, a plain chroot and also completely unchrooted and unjailed. Wine itself works fine but DRI doesn't. I recently wrote to freebsd-hackers@ and the response wasn't exactly positive. Seems 32-bit DRI is basically expected to fail when talking to a 64-bit kernel. Wine's not the one at fault here. Regards, xw