From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 22 13: 2:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from norn.ca.eu.org (cr965240-b.abtsfd1.bc.wave.home.com [24.113.19.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92D614C3B for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:02:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cpiazza@norn.ca.eu.org) Received: by norn.ca.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 56B0C76A; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:02:42 -0700 From: Chris Piazza To: Kenneth Wayne Culver Cc: Mike Smith , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc back? Message-ID: <19990822130242.A23957@norn.ca.eu.org> References: <199908221745.KAA07014@dingo.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: ; from Kenneth Wayne Culver on Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 03:07:44PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 03:07:44PM -0400, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > > I'm just wondering but I noticed when I cvsupped a few minutes ago that > > > gcc is back in the source tree. I was wondering if there were plans to > > > keep gcc in the source now. > > > > If you are tracking -current, you should be reading the commit messages. > > > > egcs has become gcc. > > I must have accidentally missed that one. Especially since egcs is still > in my source tree after cvsupping. There wasn't one. At least not here. I remember when egcs was imported it was the same thing. -Chris -- cpiazza@home.net cpiazza@FreeBSD.org "It's better to be quotable than to be honest." --Tom Stoppard To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message