From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 8 07:14:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D550B16A4CE; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 07:14:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (chesapeake.net [208.142.252.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 813A743D1F; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 07:14:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from mail.chesapeake.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.chesapeake.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i887E8dH078999; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 03:14:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) Received: from localhost (jroberson@localhost)i887E7nH078996; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 03:14:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jroberson@chesapeake.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.chesapeake.net: jroberson owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 03:14:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeff Roberson To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <413EAC0B.4050906@samsco.org> Message-ID: <20040908031300.T26496@mail.chesapeake.net> References: <200409072237.i87MbiL9044294@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040908024335.T26496@mail.chesapeake.net> <413EAC0B.4050906@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Scott Long cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/confGENERIC src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/pc98/conf GENERIC src/sys/sparc64/conf GENERIC X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 07:14:09 -0000 On Wed, 8 Sep 2004, Scott Long wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > What's not working well enough with ULE to run with it? > > > > The package build machines were switched over to 4BSD not long ago and > have since been reported to be more stable. I can also lock up or panic > my test machine within seconds with ULE, especially if preemption is > enabled. This was the case both before and after Julian's scheduler > cleanup change went in, also. I wasn't aware there were any more panics after julian's preemption change. Are there any problems without preemption? What causes the panic with preemption? > > Scott >