From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 7 10:59:29 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA10554 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 10:59:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA10549 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 10:59:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA10416; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 11:49:55 -0700 From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <199611071849.LAA10416@phaeton.artisoft.com> Subject: Re: still no response To: jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com (Joe Greco) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 11:49:55 -0700 (MST) Cc: terry@lambert.org, jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com, julian@whistle.com, hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199611071832.MAA11058@brasil.moneng.mei.com> from "Joe Greco" at Nov 7, 96 12:32:34 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > The session number limit is set external to the inetd (think: number of > > child processes). > > Yes, but that is not "per inetd, and it's compiled in". OK, ok: you could kludge your RC file to divorce the environment dependency. I'd prefer to see the inetd limit itself based on a parameter. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.