From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 00:24:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B6B37B401; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 00:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1251C43F3F; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 00:24:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h377OmA7089595; Mon, 7 Apr 2003 01:24:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 01:23:15 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030407.012315.52907595.imp@bsdimp.com> To: julian@elischer.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <20030406.221733.12213570.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG cc: core@FreeBSD.ORG cc: davidxu@FreeBSD.ORG cc: eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com Subject: Re: KSE signals broken by 1:1 commit. X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2003 07:24:54 -0000 In message: Julian Elischer writes: : We are in a bind.. : Jeff has committed changes that have broken the KSE view of signals. : however he is out of the picture for a week now. : This means that we can not pass our changes past him as we try fix it. : This is made more difficult because it appears that 1:1 threads is : broken at the moment, (see mail comments in -current), Patches have been posted. Have you tried them yet? : so we can not test our changes against the 1:1 threads code. This is related to the LAZY stuff that was committed. : All I want is a comment that assuming we take care, if jeff gets back : and finds that we've broken something for him, that we are not : nailed to a tree for it. Jeff's mail said he'd be gone only 3 more days. Things for most people aren't broken, so there's no need to rush, imho. I also think Jeff has limited access to the net, so he should be able to review things. I don't think that there's an urgent need for core to override the normal workings of the project at this time. See if you can catch him with this limited access. I'm uneasy about granting an exception to the rules when I haven't even seen a proposed patch. That's just my personal opinion. Warner