Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 04:47:47 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Juan_Ram=F3n_Molina_Menor?= <listjm@club-internet.fr> Subject: Re: Frequency of FreeBSD package builds Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412120443280.73005@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <77E4DBD49647EB45C3CF72B7@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <548428C7.2050800@club-internet.fr> <307D7D309A871FC7AB3405E1@ogg.in.absolight.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1412120154120.73005@woozle.rinet.ru> <77E4DBD49647EB45C3CF72B7@atuin.in.mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mat, On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > | Am I right supposing that each build is a full one? What are the > | downsides of incremental builds which should take less than, say, 2 days > | (if not deepest beats like gettext updates involved)? > > No, it is incremental builds, for all port versions of FreeBSD except > CURRENT, because ABI change often, and it's safer to just rebuild > everything everytime. > Right now, there are two boxes, one for amd64 and one for i386, and the > build order is the current quarterly branch for 9 and then 10, then head > for 10, 9, CURRENT and 8. Also, when there is a security advisory or [snip all the very detailed explanaition] Thank you, and all of portmanager team, very much to bring us full up-to-date packages besides all the whole debris you've just described! ;-P Seriously, pretty much of work. Thank you again. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1412120443280.73005>