From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 25 09:01:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gnome@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C5910656B8; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0976B160465; Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:00:59 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4E560F4B.40609@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 02:00:59 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110824 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Andree References: <201108240538.50514.lumiwa@gmail.com> <20110824145157.4b392216@172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net> <4E560E9B.3050508@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <4E560E9B.3050508@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -r vs. ports/UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 09:01:22 -0000 On 08/25/2011 01:58, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 24.08.2011 23:51, schrieb Doug Barton: >> On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:38:50 -0500 >> ajtiM wrote: >> >>> My system: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 >>> >>> I did: >>> >>> portmaster -r libnotify-0.\* >>> libproxy-0.\* portmaster -a >> >> It's not clear to me exactly what you were trying to accomplish there, >> but a few notes .... >> >> The -r option can only be run for one port at a time. > > Doug, > > the user probably stuck to a ports/UPDATING entry, 20110823, written by > gnome@ (cc'd). Yes, that's apparent, and quite unfortunate. > (Do we need to audit ports/UPDATING altogether for such misdirections?) I just fixed the libnotify entry, and searched down some of the more recent entries and didn't see any other similar problems. > Perhaps this behaviour could change in a future version of portmaster, Patches are always welcome. -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/