From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May 21 14:19:20 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881BD16A41F;
	Sun, 21 May 2006 14:19:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (ns.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214A943D53;
	Sun, 21 May 2006 14:19:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [87.240.16.199] (helo=[192.168.0.4])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1Fhom6-000Oya-7r; Sun, 21 May 2006 18:19:18 +0400
Message-ID: <447076D7.2090202@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 18:19:03 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060429)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200605192250.k4JMobka063225@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<446EBC76.1010409@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <446EBC76.1010409@FreeBSD.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>,
	Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org,
	ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/exilog Makefile pkg-plist
 ports/mail/exilog/files exilog.sh.in
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 May 2006 14:19:20 -0000

Doug Barton wrote:
> 
> The exilog/exilog.sh test, and the PLIST_SUB for RCSCRIPT should both be
> unnecessary with the new ports framework. Both of those should be handled
> automatically by USE_RC_SUBR.
> 

They should, but they don't.

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.