Date: Sat, 19 Jun 1999 17:43:10 +0100 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Khetan Gajjar <khetan@os.org.za> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inetd and wrapping. Message-ID: <9906191743.aa07126@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 18 Jun 1999 23:58:12 %2B0200." <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906182353290.35942-100000@chain.freebsd.os.org.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> The support (after the patches Sheldon brought in) now is > pretty good; is there any reason why the existing functionality should be > extended ? We should support atleast as much as tcpd did. I think the only thing we're missing now is wrapping the first connection of a udp/wait service and then inetd can do as much as tcpd could. (Wrapping of internal services is a bonus over what tcpd can do already). I'd be happy with just adding support for wrapping udp stuff and adding a command line flag which turns off wrapping to keep purists happy. I just wanted to see what the general opinion was. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi? <9906191743.aa07126>