From nobody Wed Jun 15 22:57:55 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1FC843D15 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 22:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.evolve.de (mail.evolve.de [213.239.217.29]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA512 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.evolve.de", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4LNggn6jm8z4nfL; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 22:57:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grembo@freebsd.org) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 121f9095; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 22:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.evolve.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 21ad4cb9 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 15 Jun 2022 22:57:56 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Differences between ports build and poudriere From: Michael Gmelin In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:57:55 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Paul Armstrong Message-Id: <24DD5A14-41CE-4AD3-9CC3-78EA0CBF2E2E@freebsd.org> References: To: Tatsuki Makino X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19E258) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4LNggn6jm8z4nfL X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=softfail (mx1.freebsd.org: 213.239.217.29 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of grembo@freebsd.org) smtp.mailfrom=grembo@freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.19 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[grembo]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.85)[-0.850]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_SOFTFAIL(0.00)[~all]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.26)[0.256]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[hotmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:213.239.192.0/18, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N > On 15. Jun 2022, at 23:11, Tatsuki Makino wro= te: >=20 > =EF=BB=BFI write optimistically in reference to the ports I maintain, but i= t seems very difficult to port a build by Bazel. > Only port of games/anki exist that are built by Bazel, but there are a lot= of patches. >=20 > It looks like it would be better to do something about the http_archive an= d http_file in the WORKSPACE file. > However, if the WORKSPACE file recurses further from there, there appears t= o be nothing that can be done. > Well however I just saw Bazel yesterday :) >=20 I agree, I worked a couple of days on changing www/envoy to build using baze= l last year, but I never managed to stop it from fetching files in the build= phase. It was quite a nightmare, unfortunately I forgot most of what I lear= ned about it and all the hacks I tried to make it work - my takeaway was tha= t bazel isn=E2=80=99t meant to be used without being connected to the intern= et. Cheers Michael > Regards. >=20 > Tatsuki Makino wrote on 2022/06/13 19:47: >=20 >=20