From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Dec 2 12:16:11 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA10241 for smp-outgoing; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 12:16:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from clem.systemsix.com (clem.systemsix.com [198.99.86.131]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA10232 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 12:16:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clem.systemsix.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA22405; Mon, 2 Dec 1996 13:16:00 -0700 Message-Id: <199612022016.NAA22405@clem.systemsix.com> X-Authentication-Warning: clem.systemsix.com: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95 From: Steve Passe To: "Eric L. Hernes" cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status report... In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 02 Dec 1996 13:49:28 CST." <199612021949.NAA04298@jake.lodgenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 02 Dec 1996 13:16:00 -0700 Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi, > I just tested a kernel from this morning (12/1). It is *much* better > than the one I tried last week. Last week I got lots of sig11's, but > I haven't seen one yet! But I am getting a few silo overflows > from the mouse, dmesg shows: > > sio1: 1 more silo overflow (total 1) > ... > sio1: 209 more interrupt-level buffer overflows (total 209) > ... > ed0: device timeout > ... > which are probably all interrupt related, no? These only show up > under load, like `make -j8', but it's definately useable! I'm in the middle of testing the various flavors right now. I got several "de0 device timeout"s, have never seen these b4. This was with APIC_IO on, am about to test non APIC_IO version. Sounds INTerrupt realted, but I haven't had a chance to look at it yet... -- Steve Passe | powered by smp@csn.net | FreeBSD