From owner-cvs-all Tue Aug 21 5:23:43 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A71037B401; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 05:23:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f7LCLPq22354; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:21:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Message-Id: <200108211221.f7LCLPq22354@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:21:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf To: roam@ringlet.net Cc: jeh@FreeBSD.org, sobomax@FreeBSD.org, cjclark@alum.mit.edu, rwatson@FreeBSD.org, dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie, alex@big.endian.de, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20010821143957.G7824@ringworld.oblivion.bg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21 Aug, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Still, this would be a good temporary workaround until a more > elaborate scheme, like the one described by Robert Watson in another > message in this thread, is deployed; but, as Robert says, a more > elaborate scheme might lower performance.. Can we control the ports just like we control devices? With file permissions? Then the admin will be able to use chown/chmod to grant permissions to particular ports: chmod g+rw /net/udp6/talk for example... The will require a portfs or some such, of course. -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message