Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 11:15:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> Cc: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does FreeBSD start slices at head boundaries? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207071114210.45763@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20120706202558.2a6d7e42.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <CAHzLAVE0CahZhkKzU5=bLy5AvKsq_qgmqwAiO9BhWD3k1_uFvQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207061842370.5024@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4FF71637.9030206@d3photography.com> <20471.8240.321332.987229@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4FF724AF.9090602@ose.nl> <20120706202558.2a6d7e42.freebsd@edvax.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> it without any problem. It _may_ be possible that some > systems like "Windows" have trouble with this approach, what trouble? Windows doesn't probably see anything. anyway i would not risk running windows with FreeBSD containing disk connected at the same time anyway. it's always risky. > To OP: > > If you omit the slice and just create two partitions (one for > FS and one for swap), FreeBSD will use this fine. Just make bsdlabel -B device is just enough after that
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1207071114210.45763>