From owner-freebsd-ports Sat May 15 1: 9:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from sdcc10.ucsd.edu (sdcc10.ucsd.edu [132.239.50.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CCC14C09 for ; Sat, 15 May 1999 01:09:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crouilla@ucsd.edu) Received: from localhost (crouilla@localhost) by sdcc10.ucsd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id BAA07392 for ; Sat, 15 May 1999 01:09:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: sdcc10.ucsd.edu: crouilla owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 15 May 1999 01:09:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Chuck Rouillard Reply-To: chuck@ucsd.edu To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: ISC DHCP-2 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org To all concerned- The ISC DHPC-2 Port is broken(the Makefile even says this). I can fix it, and I want to. But really, the orginal port is so old that it should be redone. My questions are: 1. Should I contact 'jseger' directly? 2. Is it in the interest of freebsd to continue with this port(since the packages area on ftp.freebsd -does- have the newest 'pre-compiled' patchlevel)? -sincerely ---------------------------------------------------------------------__ Chuck Rouillard ___ _______ __ ____ ______ / / chuck@ucsd.edu / _ )/ __/ _ \ / // / |/ / \ \/ / charr@sparc.sandiegoca.ncr.com / _ |\ \/ // /*/ // / / / \ \ chuckr@europa.qnc.org /____/___/____/ /____/_/|_/_/ / /\__\ *The Superior Alternative* /_/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message