From owner-freebsd-newbies Thu Jul 1 13:37:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from mail-srv.MR.COM.AR (mail-srv.mr.com.ar [200.41.14.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E1114E2A for ; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 13:37:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jote@bigfoot.com) Received: from dr.defense.edu ([200.41.15.23]) by mail-srv.MR.COM.AR (Post.Office MTA v3.5.2 release 221 ID# 0-59784U17500L14800S0V35) with ESMTP id AR for ; Thu, 1 Jul 1999 17:36:48 -0300 Content-Length: 894 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on Linux X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 01 Jul 1999 17:32:53 -0300 (ART) From: Jose Albores To: Newbies Subject: Re: NT vs Linux vs FreeBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Sorry but I just came into this list yesterday. As I see this is a technical + opinion mailing list (and I came late into this discussion): Can anyone issue some differences between Linux (I am actually RedHat 5.2 user and tried Debian previously) and FreeBSD? I know there are some variations among Sys-V vs. BSD Un?x's, but I am mostly interested to know differences referring to stability and "upgradability" of one vs. others. If it's impossible through the list, please feel free to do this in private. TIA El 01-Jul-99 Paul Anderson dijo: > On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Ulairi wrote: > >> NT is about 7 years old. Give it time, >> perhaps it'll grow up a tad. >> > And it's already a huge kludge. The problem is that Microsoft won't admit > [...] --- Jose Albores Tu "fortune": There are no manifestos like cannon and musketry. -- The Duke of Wellington To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message