From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 1 05:24:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70311066E34 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 05:23:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@ozzmosis.com) Received: from outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out6.iinet.net.au (outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out6.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459D38FC12 for ; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 05:23:27 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ai0FAEjlzUx8qExZ/2dsb2JhbACWLYsYcbk6hUQEjVEkglM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,270,1286121600"; d="scan'208";a="167194333" Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) ([124.168.76.89]) by outbound.icp-qv1-irony-out6.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 01 Nov 2010 12:55:26 +0800 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2F5241720D; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:55:26 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 15:55:26 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: Michal Varga Message-ID: <20101101045526.GA27329@ozzmosis.com> References: <20101031171808.GA22758@ozzmosis.com> <1288549637.1553.14.camel@xenon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1288549637.1553.14.camel@xenon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List Subject: Re: Portmaster 3.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 05:24:09 -0000 On Sun 2010-10-31 19:27:17 UTC+0100, Michal Varga (varga.michal@gmail.com) wrote: > > UPDATING should probably be amended upstream to correct this... > > > > Regards > > Andrew > > While I'm certainly no authority on the issue, I think that's the wrong > approach and generally (really not speaking about any specific case) - > people, or in this case, system administrators, should know how to > operate their working environment and don't just blindly enter commands > "as they found them", without trying to understand what will happen next > and/or how it will get interpreted. Indeed - that's why I wrote "probably". I can imagine arguments for and against, as you describe...