From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 04:56:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AB516A4CE for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:56:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from Espresso.NEEBU.Net (espresso.neebu.net [66.166.158.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D729B43D1D for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:56:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from khuon@Espresso.NEEBU.Net) Received: from Espresso.NEEBU.Net (khuon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Espresso.NEEBU.Net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1ACuY7v016375 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:56:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from Espresso.NEEBU.Net (khuon@localhost)i1ACuYPM016374 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:56:34 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200402101256.i1ACuYPM016374@Espresso.NEEBU.Net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: "Jake Khuon" To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Dcc: Action: Expires: Precedence: Priority: Normal X-Face: "(e&e|OIYrcV1x8y?txN%k1E2f[qWLjRjOn+a30)3>x`Wx%_9XiXs\IO2#G5L1m=c/|^h|z29wJ#]D/.?Ks,Mw1 X-URI: http://Espresso.NEEBU.Net/~khuon/ X-Organisation: Network Engineers for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation X-Header: /usr/include gives great headers X-System: Sun UltraSPARCstation2/2300MP running SunOS Release 5.8 X-Shell: tcsh 6.07.02 (Astron) 1996-10-27 (sparc-sun-solaris) options 8b,nls,dl,al,ng,rh X-Chtorr: History is full of revisionists. Where it used to say "THOU SHALT NOT KILL" it now says, "except as specified in section III-B, Paragraph 12, Sub-section D, Schedule 3." If that still doesn't suit you, wait till next year's commandments come out and trade it in for something that does. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 04:56:34 -0800 Sender: khuon@Espresso.NEEBU.Net Subject: afraid of portupgrade -ra X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:56:36 -0000 I have not done a cvsup and buildworld since the threading move in the ports tree was made. Is it okay for me to do a cvsup and buildworld WITHOUT doing a portupgrade -ra? Will I break any of my existing applications? The reason I ask is because on my laptop, I've installed a lot of ports... as in somewhere around 6500. While I typically install only what I need, my philosophy with my laptop was that I also typically end up in situations where I'll need something and not have the connectivity to download a package or grab the ports source to compile. So now I'm faced with having my machine crunch through quite a few ports... not all of which I'm confident will build correctly. -- /*===================[ Jake Khuon ]======================+ | Packet Plumber, Network Engineers /| / [~ [~ |) | | --------------- | | for Effective Bandwidth Utilisation / |/ [_ [_ |) |_| N E T W O R K S | +=========================================================================*/