From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 23 18:05:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67B0106566B; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:05:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crodr001@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4B38FC12; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:05:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yic13 with SMTP id 13so1100292yic.13 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:05:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=1UAv2tYg00J/Iv0vmmVpgbGQPo4ojum/3/kU1lNafdI=; b=jLo6HQ2j9ofi5vKji0tgX9uqfhRVQ8THM0DsSt371njZkBjcwpT4PLcSXiLkSvLFnJ 7LcpLgcqW/9jnMZNH9gsA0UM5pZ4fR+uz6IwHy3E2weSnEMO+WAdvKvvrdXB5HZejOis fjM6oVxmz4w4UObqty1dtDeS8gBW2Z06OT9KI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=jokkrxE+4AyfRwKzN2kRoLwWq0vS8hHZhMThdfxfgsjpA6zEGcm4AdjBKEyRMbHW/m zelEQBASDSehz584FWIeesg3YDmeGHSt1keobo8Tn/Bc6YyL8urAH45gJJV6Df9Auly/ Oug+hUCpdqkrm3uvOD5YJKIC2K7CVZwwC6t4U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.200.1 with SMTP id c1mr2472424anq.63.1308850857464; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.7.8 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:40:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 10:40:57 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8zzzbvi9qQAnLkDq6Fqa-acNE1w Message-ID: From: Craig Rodrigues To: obrien@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental" X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:05:46 -0000 Hi, Sounds good to me. The tmpfs(5) man page should be patched also. -- Craig Rodrigues rodrigc@crodrigues.org On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:31 AM, David O'Brien wrote: > Does anyone object to this patch? > > David Wolfskill and I have run TMPFS on a number of machines for two > years with no problems. > > I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on > TMPFS either. > > > Index: tmpfs_vfsops.c > =================================================================== > --- tmpfs_vfsops.c (revision 221113) > +++ tmpfs_vfsops.c (working copy) > @@ -155,9 +155,6 @@ tmpfs_mount(struct mount *mp) > return EOPNOTSUPP; > } > > - printf("WARNING: TMPFS is considered to be a highly experimental " > - "feature in FreeBSD.\n"); > - > vn_lock(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, LK_SHARED | LK_RETRY); > error = VOP_GETATTR(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, &va, mp->mnt_cred); > VOP_UNLOCK(mp->mnt_vnodecovered, 0); > > -- > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Craig Rodrigues rodrigc@rodrigues.org