From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 29 03:55:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFCF106566B; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:55:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikeh@fesnel.com) Received: from nagini.fesnel.com (nagini.fesnel.com [217.160.254.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089CB8FC1D; Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:55:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikeh@fesnel.com) Received: from hedwig.fesnel.no-ip.org (c-24-127-36-10.hsd1.va.comcast.net [24.127.36.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nagini.fesnel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6620D350FE; Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:38:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <47EDB9BC.5080500@fesnel.com> Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:38:36 -0400 From: Mike Heffner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: lippe@FreeBSD.org References: <200803290331.m2T3VwAo066077@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200803290331.m2T3VwAo066077@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, mikeh@FreeBSD.org, delphij@freebsd.org, luckrill@yahoo.com.cn Subject: Re: ports/121746: [UPDATE] devel/libcheck X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 03:55:02 -0000 BTW, it appears that a duplicate version of this port was added as "devel/check" back in Feb. 2007. What's the policy on handling duplicate ports in the ports tree? Mike mikeh@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: [UPDATE] devel/libcheck > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: mikeh->lippe > Responsible-Changed-By: mikeh > Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Mar 29 03:27:30 UTC 2008 > Responsible-Changed-Why: > Felippe, would you like to take ownership of this port and hence > commit this changeset? I have visually reviewed this changeset and it > appears fine. I don't have the resources to commit this right now so > let me know if you would like to do it or I can find the time. > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=121746 > > Mike -- Mike Heffner