From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 16 23:01:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF8C16A481; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD9113C457; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lAGN1uqe023152; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:01:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Pawel Worach Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:01:39 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200711161338.54270.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <473E0EA6.1070904@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <473E0EA6.1070904@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200711161801.53513.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.2/4819/Fri Nov 16 16:41:15 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [Call for Testers] ACPI-CA 20071114 X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 23:01:58 -0000 On Friday 16 November 2007 04:41 pm, Pawel Worach wrote: > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > Please test the following patch on -CURRENT: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica-import-20071114.diff.gz > > Hi, > > Looks good here on a ThinkPad T60 except for a new LOR. > > acpi_ibm0: on acpi0 > lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable) > 1st 0xc083cb00 LED mtx (LED mtx) @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:263 > 2nd 0xc09cc304 ACPI IBM extras (ACPI IBM extras) @ > /usr/src/sys/modules/acpi/acpi_ibm/../../../dev/acpi_support/acpi_i >bm.c:311 KDB: stack backtrace: --- >8 --- SKIP --- >8 --- I have to admit that I haven't really tested anything under sys/dev/acpi_support because I don't own any of these laptops. :-( Anyway, can you test the following? --- sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_ibm.c 25 Oct 2007 17:30:18 -0000 +++ sys/dev/acpi_support/acpi_ibm.c 16 Nov 2007 22:43:39 -0000 @@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ sc->led_busy = 1; sc->led_state = onoff; - AcpiOsExecute(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER, (void *)ibm_led_task, sc); + acpi_queue_task(OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER, (void *)ibm_led_task, sc); } static void Thanks, Jung-uk Kim