From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 23:38:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D0216A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:38:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao06.cox.net (lakermmtao06.cox.net [68.230.240.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC44943D58 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:38:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.140]) by lakermmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050227233846.ZFBE21504.lakermmtao06.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:38:46 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:39:42 -0600 To: vova@fbsd.ru References: <1109419564.1942.10.camel@localhost> <1109445790.1942.32.camel@localhost> <1109490309.2370.5.camel@localhost> <1109545591.1537.2.camel@localhost> From: "Jeremy Messenger" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1109545591.1537.2.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Linux, build 955) cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How does GNOME 2.9.x in MarcusCom treats you so far? X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:38:47 -0000 On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:06:31 +0300, Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > В вс, 27/02/2005 в 16:20 -0600, Jeremy Messenger пишет: >> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:34:58 -0600, Jeremy Messenger >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:45:09 +0300, Vladimir Grebenschikov >>> wrote: >>> >> >>>> Looks like they do not add any extension to icon name: >>>> >>>> % grep Icon /usr/local/share/applications/kde/KMail.desktop >>> >>> Insteresting.... I will have to check in my local machine for >>> share/applications/kde... It might be easy fix, I will check it >>> tomorrow. >> >> After the more check up with marcus, we agree that there is no way for >> us >> can do with that. There are a lot of icons that aren't working, because >> of >> GNOME is not in KDE's theme. For example, kmail is in Locolor, >> crystalsvg, >> kdeclassic and slick that GNOME doesn't have. Anything images that are >> in >> hicolor or the root of the icons directory will working fine. For >> example, >> kturtle and quanta work fine because their images are in hicolor. > > Why hicolor ? Because, it's part of freedesktop standard. http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html ======================================= In order to have a place for third party applications to install their icons there should always exist a theme called "hicolor" [1]. The data for the hicolor theme is availible for download at: http://www.freedesktop.org/software/icon-theme/. Implementations are required to look in the "hicolor" theme if an icon was not found in the current theme. ======================================= > How about default.kde ? Don't know, KDE is the one that need to change. I don't want to hack in GNOME to break the standard for KDE's sake. > % find default.kde/ -name '*.png' | wc -l > 2874 > % find hicolor/ -name '*.png' | wc -l > 168 > % find crystalsvg/ -name '*.png' | wc -l > 2874 > > Looks like default.kde has all required KDE icons, why we do not > fallback or use as primary it ? The fall back is to hicolor. Cheers, Mezz >> Cheers, >> Mezz >> >>> Cheers, >>> Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org