Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 13:19:12 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Jesse Gross <jesse_gross@yahoo.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Subject: Re: march/mcpu in bsd.cpu.mk Message-ID: <XFMail.20020801131912.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20020801154550.37460.qmail@web14107.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01-Aug-2002 Jesse Gross wrote: > On a similar note, relating to the addition of the new -march settings, > for GCC, I have written a patch for -STABLE. > > Some ports use GCC 3.1 installed from the ports tree. However, the > -march settings in CFLAGS are tuned by bsd.cpu.mk to be the flags that > GCC 2.95 can handle. My patch checks whether GCC 3.1 is being used and > if it is uses the best -march based on CPUTYPE in make.conf. I think this is not something that will scale well. Do we want to support every possible version of gcc, icc, etc. in bsd.cpu.mk? I think that will make it a mess. We should just leave it as supporting the compiler in the base system. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020801131912.jhb>