Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 22:42:49 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 285139] x11/nvidia-driver, x11/linux-nvidia-libs, graphics/nvidia-drm*-kmod: Upgrade to latest Production Branch of driver 570.124.04 Message-ID: <bug-285139-7788-GeRDSp00ru@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-285139-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-285139-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D285139 --- Comment #9 from Tomoaki AOKI <junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp> --- (In reply to Austin Shafer from comment #8) FreeBSD is used on embedded appliances, too. Not sure autonomous vehicles and/or medical appliances are included or not, though. For those use cases, IIUC, possibly VulkanSC is wanted unlike other use-cas= es. But OTOH, for those use-cases, footprint of OS (not only kernel but also ba= se system) running usually matters. This is another reason I considered VulkanSC supports in x11/linux-nvidia-l= ibs are not strongly needed (Linuxulator surely increases memory and disk footprints compared with native drivers/libraries/apps). Anyway, if anyone want it and possible to test popps in, I'll work on it af= ter completing category 1 and 2. And what I can test for x11/linux-nvidia-libs is checking whether it builds= and installs fine, as I currently don't have anything requiring the functionali= ties of x11/linux-nvidia-libs. Just trying to keep it in sync with x11/nvidia-dr= iver (which would be mandatory like with nvidia-drm-*-kmod ports, my guess). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-285139-7788-GeRDSp00ru>