From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 31 20:40:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7B6B2E for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) Received: from udns.ultimateDNS.NET (24-113-197-158.wavecable.com [24.113.197.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED00A8FC08 for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimateDNS.NET (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimateDNS.NET (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qBVKeqtv031960; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by udns.ultimateDNS.NET (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id qBVKelJs031954; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris#@1command.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net ([24.113.197.158]) (UDNSMS authenticated user chrish) by ultimatedns.net with HTTP; Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <50E1D012.1040004@missouri.edu> <20121231175808.GA1399@glenbarber.us> <6817fb4c15659b194cc658b1dfa58a31.authenticated@ultimatedns.net> Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 12:40:47 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD? From: "Chris H" To: "Chris Rees" User-Agent: UDNSMS/2.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2012 20:40:58 -0000 Greetings Chris, and thank you for your reply. > On 31 Dec 2012 19:52, "Chris H" wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> The following is hijacked from another thread, which prompts me to >> post this question: >> >> > On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 11:49:06AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith > wrote: >> >> (Not sure if this is the right mailing list, but here goes.) >> >> >> > >> > -doc@ is a better choice. >> > >> >> Last night I did a csup to retrieve the whole cvs repository. I > noticed >> >> that huge numbers of files in doc and www have been deleted. Is this >> >> intentional, or is it the svn to cvs program not working properly? And >> >> if it is the latter, are there plans to restore it? >> >> >> > >> > We are not exporting docs from SVN to CVS. There are no plans to do so. >> >> After more that 25yrs of enjoying *BSD, and all it has to offer. I find >> myself ever so resistant to change -- what with all the maintenance > scripts, >> and procedures I've created/accumulated over the years. As I'm guessing > I'm >> not the only one feeling this way, I'm wondering if there is still a CVS >> that's still current, that I might be able to mirror, and maintain, moving >> forward? Perhaps this is all folly, but this subject has been bugging me >> for some time, and reading this thread prompted me to attempt to address >> it. >> >> Thank you for all your time, and consideration. > > I'm sorry, but the exporter scripts were always a stopgap. That's what I was afraid I would hear. Recently, I was informed by SF.NET, that my account would be upgraded, and all the projects I have, which all use CVS, would be "upgraded" to SVN (which renders them useless). When I asked why, they told me because CVS was so old. To which I stated: Indeed, CVS is _quite_ old, and so is TCP/IP. Yet no one can seem live without it. Sigh... IM(NS)HO; SVN is an inferior RCS created so Windows users wouldn't feel left out. Are there _any_ CVS servers/trunks/tree's left? If so, how _current_ are they? Thanks again for taking the time to reply, Chris. All the best. --Chris > > Help is available for updating your scripts to use Subversion, please feel > free to ask. > > Chris >