Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:45:31 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Why Clang
Message-ID:  <1340192731894-5720039.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH3a3KWHYC%2BpbkdQWF4Pfqv=W0Ldzo8q4T8Ta5wgsryocxNFuA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <4FCF9333.70201@speakeasy.org> <402199FE-380B-41B6-866B-7D5D66C457D5@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <CAH3a3KWKNF5Bt-8=KgtbMh=rV6GfUO7OaeE6-SutxkcRe8cG3Q@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206191953280.8234@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20120619205225.21d6709f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20f61898ce668c96f8882981cf8e24f6@remailer.privacy.at> <4FE1AD27.8000704@gmail.com> <CAH3a3KWHYC%2BpbkdQWF4Pfqv=W0Ldzo8q4T8Ta5wgsryocxNFuA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Really, this format of discussion is rather exception
than rule (from my experience).

Nothing wrong with productive flaming for me, 
but it's just not typical code of conduct in FreeBSD
mailing list at all.

--
View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Why-Clang-tp5715861p5720039.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1340192731894-5720039.post>