From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 6 09:20:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DA21065671; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDA48FC1C; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 09:20:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC0E6761B2; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:20:56 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a0Y75auilnpF; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:20:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D076761B1; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:20:45 +0100 (CET) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.14.2/Submit) id m269KjNp054906; Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:20:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 10:20:45 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <20080306092045.GA54220@freebsd.org> References: <200803060022.m260MHSx017085@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803060022.m260MHSx017085@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/moused moused.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2008 09:21:00 -0000 On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 12:22:17AM +0000, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > jkim 2008-03-06 00:22:17 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/moused moused.c > Log: > Prefer clock_gettime(2) over gettimeofday(2) and use CLOCK_MONOTONIC_FAST. > It is only used to track elapsed time and it does not have to be precise. what is the rationale behind this? what is the expected improvement? I am not questioning the change I am just curious.. thnx