From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Thu Oct 19 00:04:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CDAE476BB for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 00:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E3D6F76B for ; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 00:04:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id C68078ECB; Thu, 19 Oct 2017 00:04:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: AT_HWCAP support on aarch64 Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 02:04:46 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 00:04:52 -0000 armv6 and armv7 recently gained support to check NEON or VFP* at runtime. However, some ports want to take advantage of AES, CRC32, SHA1, SHA256 acceleration on aarch64 as well. Do you plan to support any HWCAP_* for AT_HWCAP on aarch64? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223016 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223019 (ditto Chromium) http://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/latest/source/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/hwcap.h