From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Apr 2 04:41:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAF41555118 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 04:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAC772218 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 04:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D59541555117; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 04:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E4C1555116 for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 04:41:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55F6272215; Tue, 2 Apr 2019 04:41:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.92 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1hBBF9-000JHc-Ix; Tue, 02 Apr 2019 06:41:51 +0200 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 06:41:51 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: category for VPN softwares? Message-ID: <20190402044151.GG72200@home.opsec.eu> References: <20190402032434.i5tvmzjrti6bz44s@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190402032434.i5tvmzjrti6bz44s@icepick.vmeta.jp> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 04:41:55 -0000 Hi! > some VPN softwares are in security category/directory. OTOH, some VPN > softwares are in net category/directory. Which is correct & preferred? > Incoherent categories are a little bit surprising and confusing for me. > > I'd like to sort out categories of VPN softwares. Probably we have > following options. What do you think? I'd appreciate any comments or > suggestions. > > 1. Incoherent categories are OK and leave it as-is > 2. Move all VPN softwares to either of net or security > 3. Create a new virtual category "vpn" and leave phys categories as-is > 4. Create a new virtual category "vpn" and also sort out phys categories > 5. Another option Create a real category vpn and move everything to it ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 One year to go !