From owner-freebsd-current Thu Mar 7 14:25: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4DD37B431 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 14:24:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g27MOei95121; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:24:40 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g27MOdL97439; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 15:24:39 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2002 15:24:31 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20020307.152431.56974827.imp@village.org> To: julian@elischer.org Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for critical_enter()/critical_exit() & interrupt assem From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: References: <200203072143.g27LhaL97112@harmony.village.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG : those reviews object on a purely subjective manner. : : : "I think this is premature" : : I don't consider that to be a technical review? do you? If that's what he said, no. However, that's not all that he said. Also, Jake had several objections from a sparc64 perspective that weren't answered by dillon. My memory is different than yours. But all this "he said she said" stuff isn't getting us anywhere. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message