From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 1 02:11:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330311065673 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2011 02:11:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net (eastrmfepo102.cox.net [68.230.241.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15E58FC16 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2011 02:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20111001021109.UBNN12239.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:11:09 -0400 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.86.236]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id fEB81h00555wwzE02EB8FY; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 22:11:08 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.4E8676BC.007B,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kweOr8hB1ys3B+Zj7Lpdl4nenZeOz2KuAsXcmmON/bg= c=1 sm=1 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:17 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=S26KHJCUJyBvpKUoAwoA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=uAbGmPAyUfLL1M3oYAsfuA==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p912B7OK046334; Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:11:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 21:11:01 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: "crsnet.pl" Message-ID: <20110930211101.257941bd@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <917cb76ec75ea74b95636c382f1ea0ae@i-pi.pl> References: <588d311a0d08e016df304605b94c9a60@i-pi.pl> <20110930161029.87ca8fdc.hsaeki@wmail.plala.or.jp> <68ad2e561695c416c8f3126ed7b82a81@i-pi.pl> <20110930190726.364710ef@cox.net> <917cb76ec75ea74b95636c382f1ea0ae@i-pi.pl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9-Beta3 and FlashPlayer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:11:15 -0000 On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 02:31:24 +0200 "crsnet.pl" wrote: > > On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:07:26 -0500, "Conrad J. Sabatier" > wrote: > > > > Strange, flash works fine for me under 9.0-BETA3. Go figure. > > [cr4sh@x300 ~]$ uname -a > FreeBSD x300 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #3: Tue Sep 27 10:47:57 > CEST 2011 cr4sh@x300:/sys/amd64/compile/GENERIC amd64 > For me too. But i make csup yesterday, and when i build it. I get > BETA3 but with damaged flash. Hmmm, most peculiar. My last update was Wed Sep 28 04:37:01 CDT. Was your last kernel/world build a "clean" build? You may want to try updating your sources, nuking /usr/obj, and rebuilding/installing, just in case there's a bit of incompatible cruft lying about somewhere (not likely, I know, but it doesn't hurt to make sure). Also, I have my plugins setup in a "local", rather than a system-wide fashion. I did do a normal install from ports of all of the relevant packages, but then I either copied or symlinked the needed stuff under ${HOME}/.mozilla. I remember when I first went about setting up the flash plugin and the plugin wrapper, I couldn't get it to work properly until I did this. Honestly, I don't know exactly why I've been spared from this recent round of complaints I've seen from people re: flash, acroread, etc. and the linux emulator in general. I'm just glad that I have! Must be living right. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net