From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 13:37:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9748816A4CE; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:37:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F267F43D4C; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nectar@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lum.celabo.org (lum.celabo.org [10.0.1.107]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "lum.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9E63E2C45; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:37:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lum.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F2B608D31; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:37:19 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <42231E8F.3020003@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:37:19 -0600 From: Jacques Vidrine Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041206 Thunderbird/1.0 Mnenhy/0.7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Moore References: <200502191157.06108.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> <20050226151113.00ec3099@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <4222939A.9070808@FreeBSD.org> <200502281656.03547.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200502281656.03547.no-spam@swiftdsl.com.au> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.5.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Alexander Leidinger cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux-tiff port update X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 13:37:21 -0000 On 2/28/05 12:25 AM, Ian Moore wrote: > So does that mean I should be able to upgrade from linux-tiff-3.5.5_2 to > linux-tiff-3.6.1_1 without the security vunerabilty warning now? Yes. > (Because I > still the warnings) Argh (>_<) my typo. Will fix. Cheers, -- Jacques A Vidrine / NTT/Verio nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org