From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Jul 18 19:38:05 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE45B9D09D
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:38:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFB0E1AB1
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:38:05 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u6IJc5uE088911
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:38:05 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 199897] Mk/bsd.gcc.mk: GCC runtime should be optional
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:38:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Ports Framework
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: pfg@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gerald@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-199897-13-puss4WRbec@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-199897-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-199897-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:38:06 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D199897

--- Comment #6 from Pedro F. Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Baptiste Daroussin from comment #5)

The wish for pkg is/was being able to split a package into many.
If I understand well, the idea is to be able to split out the runtime libra=
ries
from GCC. OpenOffice could use something like that for generating the SDK as
well.

I think it is probably easier to get rid of the runtime libraries by making
them an option in the port. For now the option would be on by default.

When we get LLVM Fortran (which I have heard is advancing very well)
GCC/GFORTRAN will become of secondary importance and the GNU runtime can be
deprecated.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=