From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 09:43:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7B2F3A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@i.0x5.de) Received: from n.0x5.de (n.0x5.de [217.197.85.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB07F94 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:43:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pc5.i.0x5.de (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 3Yl8rd512Vz7ySF; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:43:45 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 10:43:45 +0100 From: Nicolas Rachinsky To: Steven Hartland Subject: Re: slowdown of zfs (tx->tx) Message-ID: <20130114094345.GB75529@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> References: <20130108174225.GA17260@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <20130109162613.GA34276@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <20130110193949.GA10023@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <20130111111147.GA34160@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <20130113235239.GA16318@mid.pc5.i.0x5.de> <778BCD159C6546A4ADC7D9FBBFC3DA8A@multiplay.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <778BCD159C6546A4ADC7D9FBBFC3DA8A@multiplay.co.uk> X-Powered-by: FreeBSD X-Homepage: http://www.rachinsky.de X-PGP-Keyid: 887BAE72 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 039E 9433 115F BC5F F88D 4524 5092 45C4 887B AE72 X-PGP-Keys: http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/gpg/nicolas_rachinsky.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-fs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 09:43:46 -0000 * Steven Hartland [2013-01-14 00:05 -0000]: > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicolas Rachinsky" > > To: "Steven Hartland" > Cc: "freebsd-fs" > Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 11:52 PM > Subject: Re: slowdown of zfs (tx->tx) > > > >* Steven Hartland [2013-01-11 13:58 -0000]: > >>TBH looks like your just saturating your disks with the number of IOP's > >>your doing. > > > >But now a backup takes forever (16hours and more) that took less than > >30 minutes two weeks ago. > > > >I duplicated the complete setup to another (slower) server. There the > >backups are slower than they were on this machine, but they are much > >faster than on this machine. ^they are ^now > > Its not something silly like you have 4k disks which aren't 4k aligned > is it? No, these are 512 bytes/sector disks. And it started to become so slow without any change (hardware or software). > IIRC you where using rsync, is there a reason why you aren't using > zfs send - recv? Most of the machines whose backups are put to this machine run with linux and don't have zfs. Nicolas -- http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas