From owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 11 12:20:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F47F16A4CE; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:20:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AA343D3F; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:20:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004031120200301600ln5kge>; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:20:03 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA94169; Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:19:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 12:19:58 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <53045.1079035854@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: current@freebsd.org cc: small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "nanobsd" prototype X-BeenThere: freebsd-small@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Dedicated and Embedded Systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 20:20:05 -0000 On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message , Ju > lian Elischer writes: > > > > > >On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > >> > >[...] > >> mkdir /usr/src/nanobsd > >[...] > >> > >> Feedback of all sorts most welcome! And more documentation > >> to arrive as it gets written. > > > >wouldn't it make sense to put nanoBSD in release alongside picoBSD? > >(that still leaves us microBSD and milliBSD :-) > > As I understand it picoBSD has never managed the 4.x->5.x transition > and is scheduled to be removed if nobody starts paying attention > to it soon. I may be looking at it soon as it still produces a smaller system than 'nanoBSD' and works well for systems with old 8MB flash. I've been using the 4.x version and may need a 5.x version 'soon'. > > re@/scottl@ asked me to not put nanobsd in src/release as they would > prefer it be kept for the "official release" stuff only, and to > me src/tools actually makes a lot more sense after all. hmmm then I guess picoBSD could probably move too. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. >