Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:33:24 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/s9fes Makefile Message-ID: <4EC36744.6040204@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <20111116044411.GA57332@FreeBSD.org> References: <201111160321.pAG3LYf3033418@repoman.freebsd.org> <20111116044411.GA57332@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote on 16.11.2011 08:44: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 03:21:34AM +0000, Eitan Adler wrote: >> eadler 2011-11-16 03:21:34 UTC >> >> Modified files: >> lang/s9fes Makefile >> Log: >> - mark port unsafe with -j > > Oh come on. Why blindly mark ports as -jX unsafe when trivial fix is > discoverable in a minute? Also, REINPLACE_CMD's usage is very lame, and > should be removed in favor of MAKE_ARGS. > > Please consider attached patch. > > ./danfe By the way, how one can detect that some port is jobs unsafe? Can this be detected on single CPU machine? -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EC36744.6040204>