From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 23:32:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E26106566B for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4393B8FC13 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:32:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-24-22-230-24.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([24.22.230.24] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PskfD-0002x4-4H for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:32:07 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:32:04 -0800 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:32:04 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <20110224233204.GI1983@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <20110224234044.0df661c1.freebsd@edvax.de> <20110224225425.GB13490@guilt.hydra> <20110225001301.e4f6d95f.freebsd@edvax.de> <21929_1298589484_4D66E72C_21929_309_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BD35499F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21929_1298589484_4D66E72C_21929_309_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499BD35499F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: Backtick versus $() X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 23:32:13 -0000 --ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Gary Gatten on Thursday, 24 February 2011: > Everyone is wrong! "pfmsh" is the best at everything, period. It does ev= erything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It doesn't require = any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure. It doesn't use any memory or other = resources, $hit, it doesn't even need to be installed; it just "magically" = works. >=20 > There you have it. >=20 That one doesn't seem to be in ports. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://chipsquips.com | http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com --ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNZup0AAoJEIpckszW26+R2hUH/25KxEW3X8kjPcR7GRvxy75c gWcOLYnjjVdT2GUWQ4T4xCI0/q4r3sZ/TsZKjxoIFgye3yzv0r+I1eL62nuV8k+F 40FpnuCCxut89H59Di93irE2tmSZw5/vtDXx4VhS9FMroQqpMQB+DvGqnJksf5tj lmVjBfwxRVfJJmw0i0qpT2Huu1B3t2Hg0cfdzvKCXOG6WHhzx3AlAL0jp4JxI3OO OmIqx6uM0xzskcyVsCStTdrmw3SuJxazG5S68SHmzRR/OJa1z34/qTRqwXjk6vmN QxJkIAVjMH+G70hH+SGyqYarBotXe8KGtH3bHT74WnmQjA/ofS512LwxJnTqvy0= =3Um2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZOudaV4lSIjFTlHv--