From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 15 07:25:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1F6106566B for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 07:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90CA8FC14 for ; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 07:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.80 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1TCmkl-0002HJ-Nz; Sat, 15 Sep 2012 07:25:24 +0000 Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:25:22 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Garrett Cooper In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: underexposed snapshots X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 07:25:25 -0000 > As I said, this is the latest snapshot. Long story short is that the > old process was changed before 9.0 and releng hasn't caught up with > the new process yet in a sustainable manner (at least, not executing > it on a regular basis). If you have interest in making sure regular > (monthly) releases are revived, I'm sure that re@ would be more than > receptive (they're good to have, but I tried to use the new process > and quite frankly don't have the spare cycles to complete the needed > work to make things function post-9.x). if folk such as i hit barriers to testing, this does not bode well for the quality of 10.x in the long run. what is the new process? i could not find in handbook. randy