From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 13 19:44:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A58237C for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com (mail-pd0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5182025BF for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:44:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id g10so232685pdj.26 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:44:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=laF+mkIbKyPVFz0+ZoIFv2/urqgtVTLY/qb90Uqh8xw=; b=ZM5XCmGw5xMBtuOMxSGZmujWivAVYkYtNbPncL6jp23KhTk4YmD+aX7sGRhHO8ikhz Idj6A00IdaJQnNHiy4CBBz8XQtZox9UZKxOmvKDg6aSJrgtI1MHxbX/0aQC9cedbBlTu i0StrNu/s7KGaWXm967QguCEChUtE606hHCFK1nw+IOD3Vo9vtYia3ftqpyNmqYvbd3Z Ajpf+EQmt/4Lxesk76AatfY8t5JbatlU8PcQh1Q2h3J8qpHg+4woKKhJcTzYM48Jteov UUe8ays70uPay5QU1xfIzrLKwaaosC3HrByQf5YrkfQVYOupVC0AqchcAc7FBNN6ZRed HhnQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.191.34 with SMTP id gv2mr5926236pbc.13.1407959088830; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:44:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.118.132 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 12:44:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <53EBB8FF.6040504@a1poweruser.com> References: <3hYH0x3vTtzCy1h@baobab.bilink.it> <53EBB8FF.6040504@a1poweruser.com> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 14:44:48 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NAT question From: Adam Vande More To: Fbsd8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Luciano Mannucci X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:44:49 -0000 On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Fbsd8 wrote: > Adam Vande More wrote: > >> >> You might want to use a more integrated and supported FW such as IPFW or >> PF >> to do NAT. >> >> >> >> Disregard that last post. > Yes, disregard the several times ipfilter has nearly gone extinct(at least in FreeBSD base), and hope very strongly it's maintainer doesn't lose interest, have a couple of kids, or get a more demanding job. Forget the the firewalls that are equally or even more capable and have a bigger dev team with long term interests in keeping them going. Keep your fingers crossed. -- Adam